EE 312: Intermediate Macroeconomics
Mid term examination
A Suggested Answer
February 1999
Answer all questions
Part 1. 20 percent
Circle the correct answer
b. Because GDP94 uses 1994 prices which are higher than 1990 prices.
d. All represent government spending on goods or services, except d.
a. It shifts back the saving line.
a. This is the only final product.
a. Interest earnings are factor income that makes GNP greater than GDP.
e. Straightforward.
a. It shifts the LM curve to the left.
a. Straightforward.
b. Straightforward.
d. Best answer
Part 2 80 percent
1. Suppose that the demand for money was described by the following equation:
Md = 70 + 4y - 0.125r
where
Md = demand for money in real term
y = real national income
r = interest rate
What is this equation telling us? Explain also what is meant by demand for money in real term 20 percent
It says demand to hold money whose purchasing power is held constant depends positively on income and inversely on interest rate.
Should there be an increase of a unit of income, the demand for money is expected to increase by 4 units, other things being constant.
If, however, interest rate increases by 1 unit, money demand is expected to decrease by 0.125 unit, other things are the same.
On the other hand, if both income and interest rate are zero, demand to hold money amounts to 70 units.
2. Given two IS curves, where the government expenditure associated with IS1 is less than that associated with IS2, explain in words (without using mathematics) why IS2 must lie on the right of IS1. Be concise. 20 percent
Each point on an IS curve is the combination of interest rate an income which equilibrates the product market.
Thus, for a given rate of interest, there will be only one level of income or spending that would give rise to the equilibrium in the market. Therefore, IS2, which represents a greater spending and income in the economy than that of IS1, must be to the right of IS1, for that rate of interest.
3. You have been asked to make stabilization policy recommendation to deal with a sluggish economy but not to alter the mix between private investment and government spending. What would be your recommendation within the ISLM analysis? 20 percent
Use either
1. A policy mix of a tax reduction and expansionary monetary policy such that interest rate is kept constant. Both tax reduction and expansionary monetary policy with proper dose would stimulate the economy. The reduction in tax, while, by itself, having no effect on government spending, may lead to an increase in the rate of interest and a decrease in investment. However, the expansionary monetary policy reduces the interest rate and thereby stimulates investment. If the application of monetary policy is maintained so that the interest rate is held at the same level before the policy mix, there should be no change in the level of investment. Hence, the mix between private investment and government spending is unaffected.
2. A policy mix of an increase in government spending and an expansionary monetary policy such that the rate of interest is lowered than before. Both would stimulate the economy. While the increase in government spending increases interest rate, the monetary policy reduces it. As the mix between private investment and government spending is not to be altered, it is necessary to apply the monetary policy so that interest rate is somewhat lowered than before. This is to invigorate investment spending further so as to match the increase in government expenditure.
4. In an attempt to counter the criticism made against New Aspiration Party (NAP) led government that it had caused inflation during its administration, an advisor to NAP said during those years budget had been kept in balance. “An increase in government expenditure that is fully financed by a rise in taxes will not generate inflationary pressure in the economy.” Do you agree with him or not. Explain. 20 percent
Can’t possibly be in agreement with him. This is because the increase in spending, although fully financed by a tax increase, still has a positive income effect and must therefore generate inflationary pressure in the economy.